Twas the Night of the Living Dead: Zombie Apocalypse Is a Good Bet

Twas the Night of the Living Dead: Zombie Apocalypse Is a Good Bet

Day might the Zombie Apocalypse arrive on Xmas? You’ll bet on it! (Image:

Every year punters place bets on whether or not they’ll get up to a blanket that is snowy their roads on Christmas morning. Oahu is the old romantic in each of us that longs for this backdrop that is scenic a joyous day, surrounded by our liked ones and overeating with all the Christmas trimmings, cannibalizing and distributing our infectious zombie disease. Wait. What?

Betting on Zombies

Though some are gambling on a Christmas that is white bookmaking giant Ladbrokes is offering odds of 2000/1 on this Christmas being the start of the Zombie Apocalypse. That is a good, festive thought to possess, and beats the odds they provide for football team Crystal Palace winning the Premier League this year at 5000/1. Mention harmful gambling.

‘we are quite confident that the odds of a Zombie Apocalypse at 2000/1 are correct, and although the public should exert caution over the Christmas period, they ought not to be unduly concerned about the undead rising up to attack and consume the living,’ announced Alex Donohue, a spokesman for the Ladbrokes bookmaker.

Chances on a Christmas that is white currently at 5/1, which is really a much better chance than those offered on the doomsday coming associated with undead, and you’re more likely in order to claim your winnings after a bit of snow in the place of having to fight your way through the zombie hordes to collect your reward. If you got that bet right, that’s for sure although you would be pretty smug with yourself.

While the possibility to bet on the Zombie Apocalypse is more than probably a nice bit of publicity for Ladbrokes, Sean Page zombie expert and founder of the Ministry of Zombies has urged the public to prepare for the worst.

‘The public is definitely interested in the chances of the white Christmas time, nevertheless they should be more concerned by the increasing likelihood of the Zombie Apocalypse,’ reported Page, suggesting, maybe, that he’s nipping during the whiskey by having a bit alacrity that is too much.

‘The many likely time for an outbreak is throughout the busy yuletide season as people spend more time in large groups, which makes it easier for the zombie virus to distribute, triggering the Apocalypse,’ Page added. Apparently, he’s seen it happen before.

Bets That Are Dead On

2000/1 seems too low for the chances of a zombie epidemic really, but this isn’t the first-time Ladbrokes has offered the chance to place wagers on the Apocalypse, as they additionally offered similar odds on the outbreak of a undead siege on December 21st 2012, owing to all of the hype around the end of the Mayan calendar to which doomsday ‘enthusiasts’ were clinging hopefully in anticipation of these impending doom.

Strangely enough, Ladbrokes are additionally providing more likely odds of 500/1 in the risk of Prince Harry getting hitched to Miley Cyrus, however the smart profit this instance would probably be regarding the zombies, despite the fact that you would be unlikely to recoup any wager due to the, you understand, end of the planet and all that. So less ‘nothing was stirring’ and more ‘watch out for the bloodthirsty, flesh-eating undead outside of the hinged door.’

MGM Clears Hurdles in Massachusetts; Gaming Commission Still Must Okay

MGM Resorts is almost through the regulatory gauntlet in Massachusetts for their Springfield casino project (Image: Artist’s rendering of casino)

Simply whenever you thought nobody would ever be good sufficient for Massachusetts’ insanely gaming that is fastidious, the MGM actually earned their approbation this week. The commission’s investigative arm which may have its own TV show called ‘MGC P.I.’ suggested that MGM Resorts be found suitable to move ahead with their Springfield casino task, with the caveat that MGM executives have the ability to talk their way out of a few lingering issues of this commission, concerns that came to light when the commission conducted its regulatory background check on the casino company.

Cleared for Remove

We aren’t whistling Dixie; the Bureau of Investigations and Enforcement spent the past 10 months looking through every speck of dust that anyone associated with MGM ever came across, and amazingly noted that they found nothing that would automatically disqualify the group from setting up house in the pristine state of Massachusetts when we say ‘lengthy.

But it’s not really a done deal yet; the five Massachusetts Gaming Commissioners still get to have the last word on whether or not MGM is in a position to work inside their neck associated with the forests. But if they give their papal blessing to the company, MGM will then manage to submit their last application as the best western Massachusetts casino license that is given out; and since they’re the actual only real remaining applicant, that would seem to become a pretty done deal.

The only real tiny ding that the Bureau could dig up after almost a 12 months of searching all documented in a 500-page report on the topic was MGM’s way of dealing previous executive board member Terry Christensen, whom in 2008 was convicted on charges relating to the wiretapping of company mogul Kirk Kerkorian’s ex-wife when Kerkorian was included in a child support fight that is gruesome.

‘Despite their indictment, resignation through the Board and conviction that is ultimate Christensen was allowed to engage, on a repeated and prolonged basis, in certain delicate and non-public business matters of MGM Resorts … including their attendance at Board meetings,’ scolded the report.

In this dance of mea culpa, MGM CEO James Murren took the position of penitent profligate aided by the Commission only at that week’s hearing, noting that it absolutely was an error for the company to allow boy that is bad to keep in every capability with the company.

‘we exercised judgment that is poor’ stated Murren, who was simply the outfit’s CFO when all this went down. ‘It was a bad idea from the very beginning. None of us should have had any experience of (Christensen).’

Mea culpa, mea culpa, mea maxima culpa.

More Executive Contrition

Murren wasn’t the only one to throw himself on the mercy of this court, as current MGM board member (and head of its audit committee) Roland Hernandez made a point to tell commissioners that protocols are now set up in the company to guarantee here will likely to be no repeats of the poor process that is decision-making.

All that has been then kept for the commish to deal with were a couple of questions they had about some MGM dealings in Macau; mostly, these centered around a partnership that is former Chinese business mogul (and daughter of casino mega-mogul Stanley Ho) Pansy Ho. Ho had been deemed unsuitable as somebody during a 2010 nj-new Jersey hearing that is regulatory the matter, and as such, MGM had to unload a 50 per cent stake in an Atlantic City casino there, simply to keep their nose clean. The allegations had been that Ho’s daddy Stanley had had dealings with some Chinese gangs, a definite ‘no-no’ in today’s regulatory video gaming universe.

Hernandez had to the Massachusetts commissioners that Ms. Ho had been included with MGM completely separate from her father, and that she was primarily involved in non-gaming business tasks regarding their MGM Macau property. Hernandez also noted that other, less finicky, states had been fine with the Ho interaction; namely, Nevada and Maryland, both of which had no problem along with it. He also noted that New Jersey has now softened their own stance, and may allow MGM back to the fold in Atlantic City.

The panel should rule later on this the commission’s chair Stephen Crosby won’t say which way the wind is blowing, but noted he appreciated the MGM execs’ openness in dealing with these issues week.

But even being truly the only applicant and regardless if cleared by the commission this it’s still not a 100 percent slam-dunk for MGM Resorts week.

‘One applicant or 10, we will hold their feet to the fire to ensure we have a really good application,’ Crosby suggested reporters during a hearing break.

Setback for PokerStars as brand New Jersey Bars Licensing for Two Years

PokerStars got a smack from New Jersey regulators this when they put them in licensing limbo for the next two years week

If there is one name that has dominated the American online poker market over the decade that is last it offers become PokerStars. However, if you’re residing in New Jersey, you mustn’t expect to be playing on a site operated by the poker giant any right time quickly.

Two Years in Limbo

The New Jersey Division of Gaming Enforcement made a decision this week to suspend the overview of PokerStars’ application for an online gambling permit for two years, effortlessly locking the organization out of the state’s on-line poker marketplace for that time period.

‘The Division of Gaming Enforcement has determined that the effective use of Rational Services Limited (PokerStars) casino solution industry licensure (CSIE) is held in a suspended status for a period of two years,’ the Division said in a declaration.

However, the hinged door isn’t totally closed on PokerStars.

‘The Division, within that duration, may look at a demand for relief to reactivate the application if significantly changed circumstances are demonstrated, of which time the Division’s investigation of PokerStars as well as its affiliated entities and associated individuals will be resumed to assess suitability.’

Bad Company, Bad Actor

Although PokerStars has long settled its case with all the authorities and admitted no wrongdoing as part of that settlement New Jersey regulators still have actually some problems with the company. Chief those types of appears to be founder Isai Scheinberg to their association, that has been under federal indictment since Ebony Friday. Scheinberg is not a U.S. citizen, and hasn’t come to your U.S. to face those charges, to nobody’s shock.

While this is a loss that is huge PokerStars, it also marks a large win for the competitors in the New Jersey market. As we reported recently, the site run by PartyPoker jointly with the Borgata Casino currently has a 50 percent share of the state’s poker market, because of the Caesars/888 World number of Poker site not far behind. Those two companies could have been overshadowed easily by the PokerStars site which will are operated in conjunction with Resorts Casino and were hoping that their mind start would give them a bonus that would allow them to keep competitive. Now, they’ll have at least two years to develop brand loyalty, a thing that PokerStars could have a time that is difficult, if and when they’ve been finally licensed for New Jersey’s online marketplace.

PokerStars ended up being predictably not thrilled by the news, though they noted that their state’s decision could improvement in the long term.

‘Our company is disappointed that the N.J. Division of Gaming Enforcement has suspended the review of our application at this time,’ said PokerStars spokesman Eric Hollreiser in a statement. ‘We note that the DGE will resume the review of our application if our circumstances change. We will stay static in open dialogue with the DGE and certainly will update them on alterations in our situation as they occur.’

This was not the first result that is disappointing PokerStars in New Jersey. Formerly, the ongoing company had tried to get the Atlantic Club Casino, just to have that deal fall apart over concerns about whether regulators would approve the purchase. That choice was also expensive, as PokerStars lost about $11 million they had spent on casino expenses a total that was supposed to be used to the eventual $15 million price.

Comments are closed.